Shell’s global strategy is to be a world class investment opportunity, delivering competitive returns for our shareholders. We are positioning the company for sustainable growth as the world transitions to a low-carbon energy system.
Shell’s tax strategy supports our global strategy. We comply with the tax laws wherever we operate. We are transparent about our tax payments, and we strive for an open dialogue with governments. This approach helps us to comply with the rules and regulations in the countries in which we operate.
We believe it is the right of governments to determine tax policies and tax rates and to draft tax laws accordingly. They do so against strong competition for capital and investment, which is internationally mobile. It is not the role of business to form views on what level of taxation is adequate or required. We use legitimate tax incentives and exemptions designed by governments to promote investment, employment and economic growth.
When considering the viability of investments, tax is only one of the factors we examine, and income tax is just one part of the overall tax regime considered. We expect to pay tax on our income in the country where activities take place, and believe double taxation of the same activity by different jurisdictions should be avoided.
Shell supports efficient, predictable and stable tax regimes that incentivise long-term investment. We expect the laws to be applied consistently, creating a level playing field for all. However, Shell operates in more than 70 countries that have differing degrees of political, legal, and fiscal stability. This exposes us to a wide range of political developments that could result in changes to contractual terms, laws, and regulations. Developments include additional taxes, windfall taxes, restrictions on deduction and retroactive tax claims.
Shell has a variety of processes for obtaining assurance on the adequacy of tax risk management and internal control, and implements a broad array of measures to manage its tax risks. There are also risks that Shell accepts or does not seek to fully mitigate. The Tax leadership team regularly considers risks and associated control mechanisms.
Shell’s board of directors is responsible for maintaining a sound system of risk management and internal control, and for regularly reviewing its effectiveness. This system also covers taxation, which forms an integral part of the Shell control framework. Annually, the board conducts a review of the effectiveness of Shell’s system of risk management and internal control, including financial, taxation, operational and compliance controls.
Tax compliant behaviour is the standard. It is embedded in the Shell General Business Principles, first published in 1976. More specifically, our Code of Conduct includes specific instructions to staff and mandatory training, especially with respect to potential conflicts of interest and the offer or acceptance of gifts and hospitality. A Global Helpline?allows employees and business partners to seek advice and report any violations.
Assurance on tax matters is embedded in the tax management framework & controls. This sets out the objectives, risks, standards and key pillars of control, appraisal and assurance processes that underpin and establish boundaries for tax activities across the group. The contents of this document apply to all staff working with tax matters across Shell whether within the tax function, other functional areas, or in the business. It is a key element of the tax management framework and controls that all staff understand its content and its relevance in their own day-to-day activities.
The Executive Vice President Taxation and Corporate Structure (EVP Tax) is accountable for all tax matters affecting Shell and for the leadership of the tax function.
Shell was one of the first energy companies to voluntarily publish revenues that our operations generate through income taxes, royalties and indirect taxes for governments around the world. From 2016 onwards, Shell makes mandatory disclosures under the Reports on Payments to Governments Regulations 2014, and files its Payments to Governments Report with the UK’s Companies House. This report is published on our website www.jatesolutions.com/payments.
Transparency?is only really effective if all parties in a country follow the same disclosure standards. Shell is a founder and board member of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Consistent with the EITI requirements, we continue to advocate mandatory country-by-country global reporting, as most tax payments are made at the corporate level to national governments. We support unified revenue reporting rules and standards applicable to all multinationals, irrespective of their ownership or place of business.
Shell is actively involved in the revenue transparency discussion and we are working with stakeholders to develop an approach that takes into account the views of the relevant stakeholders involved, namely industry, governments and civil society.?We also endorse the responsible tax principles set out by the B Team, a not-for-profit initiative formed by a group of global business leaders, and commit to implement them across our business over time?().?
Collaborating with others
Shell supports cooperative compliance relationships with tax authorities on the basis of the framework proposed by the OECD Forum on Tax Administration. We have these relationships in the UK, the Netherlands, Singapore and Italy, and we continue to explore establishing more co-operative compliance relationships in other countries. Shell is also part of the OECD pilot International Compliance Assurance Program, which aims to facilitate open and cooperative engagements between multinational companies and tax administrations.
We provide the authorities with timely and comprehensive information on potential tax issues. In return, we receive treatment that is open, impartial, proportionate, responsive and grounded in an understanding of our commercial environment. This approach improves the transparency of our tax affairs and allows Shell to better manage its tax-related risks throughout the life cycle of each project.